Skip to Content

Voluntary Departure

Last Updated: 
Thu, Oct 15, 2009

<This page is under construction>

Voluntary Departure Q&A (December 22, 2008).
This Q&A provides an overview of EOIR’s new regulations on voluntary departure. The new regulations, which go into effect on January 20, 2009, address various aspects of voluntary departure, including what happens to voluntary departure when motions to reopen and reconsider and petitions for review are filed.

AILF filed comments objecting to various aspects of the Department of Justice's proposed voluntary departure / motion to reopen rule: EOIR Docket No. 163P – Voluntary Departure: Effect of a Motion to Reopen or Reconsider or a Petition for Review, 72 Fed. Reg. 67674 (Nov. 30, 2007)

The LAC filed amicus briefs arguing that the filing of a motion to reopen tolls the running of the voluntary departure.

  • Dada v. Keisler                                              Supreme Court               No. 06-1181

For more information about this case, see our Supreme Court Update webpage.

  • Chedad v. Gonzales                                    1st Circuit                        No. 05-2782
  • Muluya v. Gonzales                                      1st Circuit                        No. 05-1829
  • Deloso v. Ashcroft                                         9th Circuit                        No. 02-72317
  • Muniz v. Ashcroft                                           9th Circuit                        No. 03-72718
  • De Martinez v. Ashcroft                                9th Circuit                        No. 02-73939
  • Ugokwe v. Attorney General                       11th Circuit                      No. 05-15237

The LAC filed amicus briefs arguing that the courts of appeals have authority to stay the voluntary departure period during court of appeals review.

  • Bocova v. Gonzales                                    1st Circuit                        No. 04-2175
  • Zazueta-Carillo v. Ashcroft                         9th Circuit                        No. 02-1541

The LAC filed amicus briefs arguing that the statutory right to file a motion to reopen must be given effect, despite the bar to relief for overstaying a voluntary departure order.

  • Bocova v. Gonzales                                    1st Circuit                        No. 04-2175
  • Chedad v. Gonzales                                    1st Circuit                       No. 05-2782
  • Muluya v. Gonzales                                     1st Circuit                        No. 05-1829
  • Deloso v. INS                                                9th Circuit                        No. 02-72317
  • Muniz v. Ashcroft                                          9th Circuit                        No. 03-72718
  • Zazueta-Carrillo v. Ashcroft                        9th Circuit                        No. 02-1541
  • Ugokwe v. Attorney General                       11th Circuit                      No. 05-15237