Motions to Reopen from Outside the Country
The LAC, working with the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, has repeatedly challenged the “departure bar,” a regulation that precludes noncitizens from filing a motion to reopen or reconsider a removal case after they have left the United States. The departure bar not only precludes reopening or reconsideration based on new evidence or arguments that may affect the outcome of a case, but also deprives immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals of authority to adjudicate motions to remedy deportations wrongfully executed, whether intentionally or inadvertently, by DHS. We argue that the regulation conflicts with the statutory right to pursue reopening and, as interpreted by the government, is an impermissible restriction of congressionally granted authority to adjudicate immigration cases.
- Perez Santana v. Holder, No. 12-2270 (1st Cir. amicus brief submitted Jan. 4, 2013). The First Circuit issued a precedent decision on September 27, 2013, finding that the departure bar conflicts with the statute. Read our statement.
- Pena-Muriel v. Keisler, 489 F.3d 438 (1st Cir. 2007) (amicus brief in support of rehearing filed Sept. 25, 2007). The court issued a precedent decision on October 24, 2007, denying the petition for rehearing, but clarifying that whether the departure bar conflicts with the motion to reopen statute is an open issue in the circuit. Pena-Muriel v. Gonzales, 510 F.3d 350 (1st Cir. 2007).
- Mansilla-Palencia v. Keisler, No. 07-1032 (2d Cir. amicus brief filed Oct. 2, 2007) (case denied without addressing validity of the departure bar, Mansilla-Palencia v. Mukasey, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 4488 (2d Cir. Mar. 3, 2008)).
- Taylor v. AG of the US, No. 12-2599 (3d Cir. amicus brief submitted Aug. 30, 2012)
- Izquierdo v. AG of the US, No. 12-2499 (3d Cir. amicus brief submitted Aug. 23, 2012)
- Prestol Espinal v. Atty General of U.S., No. 10-1473 (3d Cir. amicus brief filed June 8, 2010). The court issued a precedent decision on Aug. 3, 2011, finding that the departure bar conflicts with the motion to reopen statute. Read our statement.
- William v. Gonzales, No. 06-1284 (4th Cir. amicus brief filed July 25, 2006). The court issued a precedent decision on September 6, 2007, finding that the departure bar conflicts with the motion to reopen statute. William v. Gonzales, 499 F.3d 329 (4th Cir. 2007).
- Lari v. Holder, No. 11-60706 (5th Cir. argued June 5, 2012). The Court issued a precedent decision on September 27, 2012, finding that departure bar conflicts with the motion to reconsider statute. Read our statement.
- Ovalles v. Mukasey, No. 07-60836 (5th Cir. amicus brief filed March 13, 2008). The court issued a precedent decision on July 27, 2009, applying the departure bar to a sua sponte motion, but declining to decide whether the departure bar conflicts with the motion to reopen statute. Ovalles v. Holder, 577 F.3d 288 (5th Cir. 2009).
- Pruidze v. Holder, No. 09-3836 (6th Cir. amicus brief filed Dec. 16, 2009). The court issued a precedent decision on February 3, 2011, finding that the departure bar is unlawful. Pruidze v. Holder, 632 F.3d 234 (6th Cir. 2011). Read our statement.
- Marroquin v. Holder, No. 10-1846 (8th Cir. amicus brief filed Aug. 16, 2010) (case granted and remanded without addressing the validity of the departure bar, Marroquin v. Holder, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10350 (8th Cir. May 23, 2011)).
- Gonzalez Salazar v. Holder, No. 09-70867 (9th Cir. amicus brief filed Oct. 8, 2010).
- Reyes Torres v. Holder, Nos. 09-70214, 08-74452 (9th Cir. amicus brief filed Jan. 11, 2010). The court issued a precedent decision on April 7, 2011, finding that the departure bar conflicts with the motion to reopen statute. Reyes Torres v. Holder, __ F.3d __, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 7062 (9th Cir. Apr. 7, 2011). Read our statement.
- Jimenez-Barrerra v. Holder, No. 05-77110 (9th Cir. amicus brief filed Apr. 30, 2009) (case granted and remanded without addressing the validity of the departure bar, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23772 (9th Cir. Oct. 28, 2009)).
- Contreras-Bocanegra v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1170 (10th Cir. 2010) (amicus brief in support of rehearing en banc filed Mar. 8, 2011). On January 30, 2012, the en banc court vacated the panel's prior decision (629 F.3d 1170 (10th Cir. 2010)), overruled Rosillo-Puga, and found that the departure bar conflicts with the motion to reopen statute.
Rosillo-Puga v. Mukasey, No. 07-9564 (10th Cir. amicus brief filed Jan. 18, 2008). The court issued a precedent decision on September 15, 2009, upholding the departure bar. Rosillo-Puga v. Holder, 508 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2009).
Petition for Rulemaking to Amend Regulations Governing Motions to Reopen and Reconsider Removal Proceedings for Noncitizens Who Depart the United States (submitted August 6, 2010). The LAC submitted a Petition for Rulemaking to the Department of Justice and the Executive Office for Immigration Review, urging the Department to rescind the regulation barring post-departure motions to reopen.
Departure Bar to Motions to Reopen and Reconsider: Legal Overview and Related Issues (March 14, 2012). This Practice Advisory discusses the "departure bar" to motions to reopen and arguments adopted by circuit courts that have rejected or upheld the bar.
Hold CBP Accountable
actions taken across the country in an ongoing effort to establish accountability and transparency of one of the fastest growing agencies in the United States.
Administrative Relief Resource Center
Learn how individuals can prepare for administrative relief, find legal assistance and community education resource, and ways that you can help immigrants and immigrant-serving organizations.
- District Court Rules Grant of TPS Is an Admission for Adjustment of Status Purposes
- First Circuit Joins Other Courts in Holding That Immigrants Can Pursue Cases From Outside the United States
- Seventh Circuit Decision Expands Availability of Hardship Waivers to Lawful Permanent Residents
- ICE Agrees to Release Thousands of Previously-Withheld Records
- Court Says ICE Failed to Satisfy FOIA Requirements in Council’s Suit to Compel Disclosure of Records on Access to Counsel
- Eleventh Circuit Holds That Filing Limitations on Motions to Reopen Are Subject to Equitable Tolling
- Letter to DHS Outlines Problematic Practices That Undermine Due Process Protections for Asylum Seekers
- Transfers of Detained Families Traumatizes Mothers and Children and Interferes with Access to Lawyers
- Unrepresented, Unaccompanied Children Ordered Deported After Just One Hearing
- Can State Agencies License The Detention of Immigrant Families?
- Temporary Restraining Order Against Texas Family Detention Centers Issued
- Supreme Court Considering Whether Misdemeanor Results in Automatic Deportation
- Obama Administration Goes to the Supreme Court in DACA and DAPA Lawsuit
- Visa Bulletin Change Fails to Deliver
- Visa Bulletin “Do-Over” Undercuts Visa Modernization
- First Step in Visa Modernization: Making the Wait More Palatable
- Five Families Released After Prolonged Detention
- Restrictionists Continue to Attack H-4 Work Authorization
- Government Ordered to Promptly Release Children From Family Detention
- Court Issues Decision in Washtech, Case Challenging Training for U.S.-Educated Noncitizens
- Annual Review of State-Level Immigration Policy Still Trending Pro-Immigrant
- The Government Doubles Down on Locking Up Immigrant Mothers and Children
- Insider Speaks Out Alongside Formerly Detained Mothers Seeking Protection in the U.S.
- Court Finds Federal Officers Can be Sued for Mistreatment of Immigrants in Detention
- Judge’s Order in Flores Should Signal the End of Family Detention
- White House Report on Improving Our Legal Immigration System: Too Little Too Late?
- Some 3-Year Work Permits Being Recalled by USCIS
- Appellate Court Hears Oral Argument in Texas v. United States
- U.S. Settles With 4-Year-Old U.S. Citizen They Wrongfully Deported
- Members of Congress Report on Texas Family Detention Center Visits
- Supreme Court Finds Conviction for Possession of a Sock Was Not a Deportable Offense
- Court Rejects Restrictionists’ Attempts to Derail Work Authorization for H-4 Spouses
- Immigration Appeals Court Reverses Position on Deportation Waivers
- Why DAPA Applications Were Not Accepted by USCIS on May 19, 2015
- Reports: Detention Doesn’t Deter Migrants and Refugees From Coming to United States
- Arpaio Faces Skeptical Judges In Lawsuit Challenging Obama’s Immigration Action
- Supreme Court to Decide Whether It’s Okay to Deprive a Person of His Day In Immigration Court
- No Justice For Family of Mexican Child Killed By U.S. Border Patrol Agent
- The Court Decision on Deferred Action Everyone Should Be Talking About
- Faith Leaders Visit Immigrant Detention Center as Mothers Begin Hunger Strike
- Immigration Agency Issues Long-Awaited Guidance on L-1B Visa Petitions
- Government Claims Children in Family Detention Centers Are Not Entitled to Protections
- Documenting Ongoing Border Patrol Abuses
- Immigration Action Provides Certain H-4 Spouses Work Authorization
- New Immigration Enforcement Policy Remains In Effect Despite Texas Lawsuit
- Supreme Court Hears Argument on Whether Government Must Justify Its Visa Denial
- The Detention of Children and Their Families is Still Unjust and Still Against the Law
- Unrepresented Children Still Being Fast-Tracked Through Immigration Hearings
- When is Possession of a Sock a Deportable Offense?
- U.S. Education of Foreign Students is Under Attack
- Do the President’s New Immigration Policies Really Mark the End of Secure Communities?
- How New Guidance Improves a Waiver Program to Limit Family Separations
- Five Things to Know About Deportation Relief for Some Immigrant Parents
- How Many Immigrants Could Be Eligible for Relief and Not Know It?
- Civil Rights Complaint Documents Government’s Failure to Properly Screen Asylum Seekers
- Third Federal Court Rejects Government Interpretation of ‘Admission’ into U.S.
- How USCIS Tried to Keep Out a Skilled Brazilian Steakhouse Worker
- How Can a Three Year Old Represent Himself in Court?
- Report Discloses Deportation of Central American Asylum Seekers
- Federal Court Refuses to Dismiss Case of U.S. Citizen Girl Who Was Deported
- Inspector General Falls Short in Documenting Border Detention Conditions
- Why Groups Are Suing the Government over Rushed Deportation Process for Mothers and Children
- Courts Continue to Reject Arizona Style Laws, Even as House Embraces SAFE Act
- Here Are Some of the Stories of Women Held at Artesia
- Why We are Suing the Government on Behalf of All Children Facing Deportation
- District Court Decides Some TPS Beneficiaries May Finally Become Lawful Permanent Residents
- SCOTUS Decides Immigrants Can “Age-Out” of Visa Petitions
- The DACA Renewal Process: Everything You Need to Know
- CBP Releases Report Critical of Agency, Issues Updated Use of Force Policy
- Summary Removal Procedures and Their Role in Rising Deportations
- New Data Show More Than Half a Million Immigrants Granted DACA
- Drop in Court-Ordered Deportations Means Little to Overall Deportation Numbers
- USCIS Releases Information About DACA Renewal Process
- Circuit Court Ruling Affirms Detainers Not Mandatory
- New Directive Clarifies Existing Use of Force Policy at CBP
- Customs and Border Protection Conceals Scathing Audit of Border Patrol’s Use of Force Policy
- What the DACA Renewal Process Should Look Like
- Petition Challenges DHS on Enforcement Priorities
- The Washington Post Exposes Sorry State of Immigration Courts
- Miranda-like Warning for Immigrants Argued in Ninth Circuit
- Why Is There a Disparity in DACA Application Rates Among Different Nationalities?
- Supreme Court Considers Restrictive Interpretation of Child Status Protection Act
- The Punishment Should Fit the Crime for Immigrants, Too
- Keeping CBP In Line With Proposed Reforms
- Understanding DACA's Education Requirement
- Supreme Court to Interpret Child Status Protection Act
- New York City Pilots Free Legal Representation in Immigration Court